Two of six healthcare AI use cases have at least moderate evidence on all three outcomes
Kent Applied scores for six AI use cases on clinical, operational and financial outcomes, from Weak to Strong, against published evidence as of September 2026
About the data
- Source
- Kent Applied, Where healthcare AI has proof, and where it does notFig. 5, and Explore for the evidence behind every score
- Method
- Tyler Kent scored each use case on four levels (Weak, Emerging, Moderate, Strong) on clinical, operational and financial outcomes, the financial one net of the cost to run it. A use case meets the bar when all three reach Moderate or better.
- Published
- Updated
Free to share and embed with credit to Kent Applied (CC BY 4.0). The source data keeps its own terms.
Related charts
- From research
The 320% documentation AI growth figure compares plans with current use
Healthcare Dive, sponsored content by Microsoft, March 10, 2025; Kent Applied, Where healthcare AI has proof, and where it does not - From the blog
Only 5% of organizations put a custom or vendor-sold generative AI tool into production
MIT NANDA, The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025 (July 2025) - From the blog
4 of the 7 practice problems on Kent Applied's map need no patient data
Kent Applied, Where AI tools fit in healthcare, by kind of organization; NYC Local Law 144; California Civil Rights Council - From the blog
Imaging, insurance checks, charting and billing lead dentists' current and planned AI use
ADA Health Policy Institute, The State of the US Dental Economy, 2nd Quarter 2026 Update
Sources for the figures above: This healthcare AI use case will grow 320% by 2026, survey finds (opens in a new tab); MIT NANDA, The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025 (July 2025) (opens in a new tab).
Related service
Book a 20-minute call
Tyler Kent can measure a question like this one in your own data. Start with a short call.
Prefer to skip the call? Get a written proposal
Or email tyler@kentapplied.com.